A MOST NEGATIVE VIEW

Many of us in this country have heard how the head of = the Killer Empire, Gorbachev, told the leader of Pakistan that he takes a &q= uot;most negative" view of Mr. Zia giving any more help to Afghanistan. He objects to people helping the maimed children, disfigured by the booby trap= ped toys dropped from his deadly helicopters. We and your family do agree that = the Killer Empire is the "most negative thing" ever to happen to = the world, is the worst scourge to ever visit our planet. This Killer Empire= has killed more people in the last 70 years than all other empires of the past = put together in the history of mankind. The scourage of their killings and starvation will soon pass all the number of people who died from smallpox, bubonic plague, cholera, and tuberculosis combined. 120 million in t= he Soviet Union, 70 million in C= hina, 4 million in Cambodia, 3 million in Vietnam, 2 million in Afghanistan, 10 million in Africa,= and the list of millions goes on. PEOPLE -PEOPLE - PEOPLE. A = free mankind is an endangered species at the hands of the Killer Empire.

The bureaucrats of this Killer Empire don't have and cannot even conceive of the idea of using judgment (the abili= ty to combine good Adult information processing with Parental teachings). They have very few alternatives because they think like one body, = they think differently than you and I, Musha. They can compromise, but only after a great deal of pushing and shoving among themselves and after eliminating most reasonable alternatives.

Those groupy people with a "most negative view" can only decide "things" (people events) in their groupies and then only after the more powerful of their kind have shown the others "some good reasons why", have out talked, brow beaten the others of their group into accepting "the consensus plan." After "consensus" (that means after everyone else has been forced to ag= ree with the leader) they then rehearse their tasks to be implemented later. Th= ey gather up their resources and then wait to pounce upon their prey. After th= ey have softened up their victim over a period of time, by conditioning him, by feeding his appetites, by beating him down psychologically and if possible = by getting him to do something bad that he gets "caught" at, betrayed on, and made him too weak to resist, then the final touches are added. They spring a trap.

Because of this thinking/psychological groupy, absolute limiting requirement to go over their adventures in groups as they unfold, = the group members project a lot of their ineptness onto others and therefore ar= e compelled to get rid of some of "them." T= hey attempt to substitute "group brainstorming" and group discussion = for judgment. The result is not bad judgment, this is the total absence of judgment, compassion, loyalty= , and pride.

These MOST NEGATIVES, these NEGITES are like the sadis= tic homosexual Mr. Ennat as written by Eric Berne. They are lacking a true Pare= nt in their individual heads. At best they use a childhood imitation of a Parent, an artificial Parent, a "droid" Parent, a "toy" Parent. The negites are led to believe that continuous reviewing of alternatives will serve as a substitute for judgment. They are paralyzed when it comes to individual action or expression= of independent thought because they f ear what their fellow groupies will say or do to them. They are fearful of making a mistake, and they do make mistakes. Their groups make mistakes, too.=

=

When they do make mistakes their fellow groupies t= ell them how stupid they are. They ha= ve no inner, self-sustaining true Parent, no firmly fixed set of ideals, no set of personal values of what is right and wrong. They only know what their fellow groupies tell them. That is why they call their own substitute for an inside guiding set of standards "the critical Parent." The only correcti= ve guiding they get is in the demeaning, harshly critical tones and words of t= heir fellow groupies in sessions. Part of becoming a negite and member of the Invisible Bureaucracy is to have one's own personal sense of values that co= me from Mom and Dad gradually erased, chipped away piece by piece while getting better and better at pretending.

FREEDOM vs US STATE DEPARTMENT <= /b>

On August 3, 1972 the United States Senate made a deal that compromised the Constitution of the United States of America and threatens freedom. The Senate voted 88 to 2 to ratify the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) between the United States and Russia, which limited antibal= listic defensive missile systems. The Constitution of the United States of America says we must defend ourselves against all enemies foreign and domestic. Yet= in the past few years the US State Department with the assistance of the US Senate and US Congress has selectively been inattentive and has even shut o= ff the ability of free people to learn about the Killer Empire and the = big need here to defend ourselves against their bombs, missiles and sabotage.

South Africa used to keep track of the Empire's submarines spying = on the shipping tankers going around the southern end of Af= rica. Free trade and access to energy reserves in the Pers= ian Gulf depends on the use of that highway in the sea. However, t= he US State Department will not allow South Af= rica to purchase replacement airplanes in order to keep on patrolling the ocean waters off the Cape of Good Hope. The St= ate Department says we made a deal with this Empire not to defend oursel= ves against its aggressions; therefore this applies to us helping other countri= es defend freedom.

Today it appears that = Mozambique's efforts in regaining freedom are being hindered by the US State Department. These facts have been: (1)well censored, (2) confused; (3) = the people obstructing the facts are generally unknown, (4) the known obstructi= onists are well protected, too, and (5) the fact that most people don't realize th= at $375 million US dollars have been sent to the Communist government of Mozambique and Samora Machel to crush Renamo and freedom there. Freedom lov= ing South Africa is being browbeaten and abuse= d by this country's TV and papers whenever it helps the people in Angola and Mozambique regain their liber= ty.

The US State Department encourages the US media to harass South Africans and to turn off the American people about South Africa. In the meantime, it sends $400 m= illion from U.S. banks to Com= munist Angola, enough to pay = for all the Cuban, Russian, North Korean, and European soldiers and some of the Russian tanks and helicopter gunships in Angola. Is the US State Depart= ment hindering the efforts of free= dom loving people in Central America, too? <= /u>Read what Joel Skousen has to say about this.

has also helped the people in Namibia. We do not hear about= this, either. Turner Broadcasting Company's CNN had a few stories about this the = day before the Space Shuttle Challenger was blown out of the sky. We were remin= ded here how U.S. space program has been stained and tainted before so many times. As one example, it was only hours before Neil Armstrong was due to step onto the m= oon July 19, 1969 that the Chappaquiddick Kid had his day; Mary Jo Kopechne die= d. We only hear how apartheid is bad; nothing about their successes at correct= ing it and far more rapidly than in this country.

The facts are cl= ear and they point to the forked tongue hypocrisy of some of career members of = the US State Department. Now we hear all around us about the effects of the Invisible Bureaucracy and its branches intervening in the elections of the Philippine Islands. This Bureaucracy is quite intent on getting our country= to betray the Philippines just like they got us to betray the people of Iran a= bout 8 years ago, and your country for 7= years now. The evidence says The Killer Empire thru the Invisible Bureaucracy is using the US State Department to fight against freedom in Angola, Mozambique and South Africa (Frank Wizner, Chester Crocker). Is this is what is h= appening in Afghanistan, too= ? We hear that our CIA's John McMahon, using bureaucratic chokepoint theory, has been blocking help to = Afghanistan<= /st1:country-region>.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style"'>The people of Mozambiq= ue, northeast of South A= frica are struggling to regain their freedom from the tyrants of the Killer Empir= e. Their freedom movement, called Renamo, has been succeeding to a limited deg= ree. But over 20,000 babies, boys, girls, and people of all ages have been kille= d in the last three years by the indiscriminate acts of the Most Negative Emp= ire. These are killings under Samora Machel of his own countrymen. Genoci= de? They are racial, tribal killings out of prejudice and spiteful cruelty. This does not happen in free countries.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style"'>Like the freedom organizers in Savimbi's Angola, RENAMO only asks that the US stop= sending hundreds of millions of dollars of US Taxpayer's dollars to anti-freedom, oppressive governments. What would the outcome have been if the present day U.S. State Department had been running things during the American Revolution of 1776 ?

U= nited States Senator Jake Garn, angry about new U.S. bank loans to the Soviet Uni= on, is pushing legislation that would give the President the power to ban such credits.

The Utah Republican, who is the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, announced committee hearings and action in September in the wake of a new $600 million loan to the U.S.S.R. organized by First Chicago Bank.=

"I want to know how the American bankers are going to explain to U.S citizens - who can't get mortgages or are facing fa= rm foreclosures -why their banks are organizing half-billion-dollar loans to o= ur adversaries," Garn said.

Yeah, And why is our Congress trying to destroy = one of our few friends, Sou= th Africa, and to deliver it to our Soviet enemy? Millions of blacks want into South Africa; none wants out. Hundreds of millions of people want out of the Communist slave states; none wants in.

-- American Way Features

<= o:p>

In more recent months members of the Invisible Bureaucracy in our nation's Democratic Party and in our Congress have been advocating "punishing&q= uot; free South Africa. What is this Invisible Bureaucracy that is pushing so hard for the abolition = of freedom? People are so used to calling Invisible Bureaucrats "Communist", "liberals", "radicals", etc. they forget they don't even know what a Communist is, let alone what prompts and controls them, how their personali= ties work, and how so very different t= heir personalities are from the uncontaminated personalities of free peop= le. W e will do better when we quit calling= them communists and instead, refer to them by a better, more appropriate, object= ive term. We propose the term "NEGITE." The Invisible Bureaucracy is composed of an army of "negites."

=

=

ACCURACY IN MEDIA

<= b>

<= b>Most of our newspapers are pretty much under the contr= ol of this Invisible Bureaucracy. M= any, maybe most reporters working for newspapers are good people, though. All of them, however, are subject to the same pressures as you and I. What I mean is that reporters may want = to write all the news, the whole story, be as= honest and accurate as they can. But when they write about somebody doing a good job for freedom = the story usually does not get printed. If the reporter is still a cub and still believes he could get a straight answer from his boss or the editor, then he might ask why our home-grown, at-home freedom fighter is never mentioned in our newspaper. The reporter begins to get the message after several tries. The individual = who believes in freedom for the citizens often gets quoted when he says somethi= ng that could get him in trouble, be misconstrued, misinterpreted or make him = look foolish. More than likely, if the newspaper boss is a member of t= he Invisible Bureaucracy our new reporter will be told one of these standard <= /b>put down phrases:

"Oh that's not really news."

"We can't just be writing about the characters in town."

"Oh not that stuff again. We don't want too much of the same thing." "He is in the minority. Don't= pay any attention to him."

"He's just a crack pot."

"He's just trying to get his name in print."
"People don't care about what he's saying. It's beyond most people. "It's too complicated."

"His answers are too simplistic."

"We don't want just anybody for the story." <= /p>
"We have to write for readers who are not very smart." <= /u>

"Oh he wants on the bandwagon, too,"

=

and so forth to discourage the reporter. The reporter's freedom stories are "put on the spike." Pretty soon he gets the message. This is technically called operant conditioning.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style"'>

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style"'>Old-time reporters who know what the score is will just indulgently smile the idealist on who protests about censorship. He may on the other hand caution our fr= eedom "zealot" about not banging around too hard if he wants to keep his job, that there are a lot of other reporters who could be hired if t= he editor gets annoyed with the cub's persistence. The oldtimers in the trade admit privately that what is printed isn't necessarily the news, and certainly is lopsided. Many openly admit that much of the news is aimed more at influencing individuals away from the advantages of being fre= e than in writing clean news.=

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-weight:bold'>To write about a person who thinks for himself is discouraged. Instead, the glorious benefits of groupi= ng are written. Writers are told to write about groups arriving at a consensus= . In our Universities and Colleges they are taught the pleasures and gains of submerging differences. Some of them have brought their liberal views with = them from behind the Iron Curtain. Some are taught and told to look for specific prearranged group actions where any disagreement or personal view at varian= ce with the "majority" can be claimed to be eccentric, out of step <= /span>with "the people", "society."

<= u>Unwittingly or not, newspaper reporters today are encouraged to ostracize or cause a person to = be subjected to peer pressure because of his views. We have watched and listened to how people are negatively influenced, argued i= nto giving up their thinking, or suggested out of their own thinking, by innuen= do, tone of voice, jeering remarks, leering smile, defamatory stories, cruel gossip, and then cheered on for doing stupid things as a result of a slante= d or bogus news story. The media and the network of Invisible Bureaucrats surrou= nd, blanket, ridicule and discourage most of the clear thinking people into shutting up. Negative thinking Invisible Bureaucrats will hammer away at an individual's thinking process when someone else’s original anti-oppression idea make sense. Negites do their best to suppress, belittle new ideas until they can control and pervert the ideas to their own use. Th= ey obscure fresh ideas, ignore them, they funnel the alternatives of ideas into narrow channels to control the direction of public opinion.

<= i>The groups in positions of negative influence of the unofficial coalition of the national newspaper e= ditors "decide" (are ordered) to print (or not print) certain<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> stories, decide "what is newsworthy." "The National Coalit= ion of Editorial Policy", as a branch of the Invisible Bureaucracy, has influenced many parts of our land, our government's official actions. As you can see Musha, most of what is called our "free press" is real= ly under the negative influence if not direct control of the unofficial "coalition of national editorial policy", the "news" branch of the Invisible Bureaucracy. (See Reed Irvine's periodical "Accuracy in Media.") We now see it and its disinforma= tion service going into action in the Philippine Islands.

PEER PRESSURE a= nd OPERANT CONDITIONING

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style"'>

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: "Bookman Old Style"'>We were so glad to hear one of your father's cousins conscripted by the Russians was able to warn your village about the coming Russian raid on New Year's Day in time for you to get away before it happen= ed.

We both know a l= ot about "unofficial" pressure. When our friends are talking about not liking their mommy or daddy, then = if we want to keep them as friends it doesn't make very good sense to talk abo= ut how we like our own parents. In grown-up language this is called "p= eer pressure." If your friends talk about their parents in a jeering manner they are giving up good judgment, but you are keeping yours by not talking about yours. We are glad you know you can find other, better friend= s if that happens to you. I (H.) once knew a priest who encouraged me to talk bad things about my pare= nts. I gave up my priest friend. You might ask why didn't he trust the priest. Well, I wanted to, but this one w= as a fake, hiding behind a cross. He tried to cross me up with my parents= . He was urging me to break the Fifth Commandment "Honor thy Father and thy Mother."<= /span>

Peer Pressure is a form of operant conditioning. More sophisticated manipulators of peer pressure use OPERANT CONDITIONING as a way to more easily control and influence free thinking and speaking people. We become conditioned by processes, practices, standards, events, incidents, management decisions, other people and what happens to t= hem. Negites use OPERANT CONDITIONING for the benefit of the Invisible Bureaucra= cy by exerting harmful demoralizing indirect influences on our lives, i.e our families, friends, businesses, governments, and other aspects of our free society. The Invisible Bureaucracy is very, very skillful at the techniques= of this kind of divisive influencing and controlling.=

The Invisible Bureaucracy is dedicated to just such a goal: Control of all mankind, their minds and bodies; t= o make the rest of the human race become the servants and slaves of the central corps of its controllers. Its goa= l is to control what the "slaves" see, read, hear and even think. The Invisible Bureaucracy has <= /b>this goal because it fears the individual. An individual who has a gift f= or and ideas about freedom can show how the entire Invisible Bureaucracy will = tear itself apart. Listen to what Dr. Jack Wheeler has to say about this.

NEGITES COME FROM FAMILIES <= /p>
<= b>

<= b>Operant conditioning is not bad in and of itself thoug= h. Our families, the core of free people are held togethe= r by how fellow family members influence us. From our families we learn to live = with other people. We learn to respect their ways. Each member of the Invisib= le Bureaucracy has come from a family. In our hearts each one of us knows which one is = the family negite, which ones are betraying our family trust. In our minds we may = not want to believe he would do such a thing,&= nbsp; but in our hearts we know. We know inside ourselves who they are. The betrayer's loyalty is no long= er given to the family from which he came. He has another overriding program and lust, and o= nly pretends to his children, sisters, brothers, wife or husband and parents.

<= o:p>

<= span style=3D'mso-tab-count:1'> &= nbsp; For the negite members of the Invisible Bureaucracy, ideas like compassion,
liberty, mercy, sympathy, and feeling for the individual and his dreams and ambitions
are only roles to learn to pretend and play in order to blind real people. = The ideas

which are at= the center of the free man's character and personality are only words to be pla= yed with and used by the negite in order to sound more convincing to the unsuspecting and suggestible; just words used to keep fooling good people of the world. Many a prominent negite is skillful at showing different colors = at different timesfor different people. His (her) tones, words and the "v= alues" he talks about merely reflect the current group programming he is getting as this is ordered by those higher in his own power pyramid.=

Negites do have a personality disorder. As individuals they lack a personal conscie= nce. They are true psychopaths held in line (like the obedient soldiers they are= ) by blackmail, bullying, bribery, by reminding each other 'Well you know you as= ked to be in it" to any who would object to an assignment or an order. Not= one of them has a personal set of standards.

THEY ARE THE SOLUTION

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: Garamond'>

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Bookman Old Style";mso-bidi-font-fam= ily: Garamond'>Why do people join and continue to staff the Invisible Bureaucrac= y? Why do they protect the Killer Empire? H= ow do young people in their early teens get&n= bsp; persuaded, tempted, seduced, frightened into taking those first few = fateful steps that ultimately lead th= em to alienating and invalidating themselves? How is this "invisible" form of child abuse allowed to con= tinue? How do we as fellow family members get&nbs= p; lulled and/or sidetracked into not noticing what is happening right within our own families? One = child from my own family, one from my neighbor's, one from my doctor's. one from my councilman's= , one from my professor's family, my Congressman's family. One by one these children are successfully recruited away from us by the= se child molesters. How is it that so many intelligent people become vassals, obedient soldiers, servan= ts of this Invisible Bureaucracy that so totally wipes out any independent dreams and goa= ls of earlier life?

<= u>

<= u>Part of the answer and part of the weakness of the Invisible Bureaucracy lies in= its unremitting, unrelenting hold over its troops. Its members are systematically crippled into = total dependency on each others strokes. Like termites, negites build tunnels into and feed on the stren= gths of uncontaminated people. They also depend&nb= sp; on the strokes of good people. And they trick good people into front= ing for their goals. They cannot survive as individuals because they have been drained of individual self respect, self este= em, and pride. They are shells with no personal sense of direction. Not one of the= m owns any personal set of standards for his own&= nbsp; behavior.

As we study their negative societal influence we see that they respond by trashing, stinking up, maiming, stealing, terrorizing. They want to disrupt= the thoughtfulness of the free, fill o= ur time with their words and feelings. But they are the solution. Learn from them = and they will tell us how to undo them. Be patient. In time they will show us h= ow to dismantle this Bureaucracy that helps the Killer Empire spread its cance= rous stranglehold on ever more of Allah's Holy children.

Once the bureaucracy is dismantled, then this Killer Empire can no longer exist, will cease to be.

Musha, let us hear from you again. We pray for your safety. Listen to your mother = and pray for your brothers and father.

&= nbsp; Love,

____________________________________________= _______________________

Franklin "H= arry Ernst III &nbs= p; &= nbsp; Franklin H. Ernst= Jr., M.D.

= &nb= sp; Addresso’Set Publications

Fr= anklin “Harry” Ernst III

&= nbsp; Permission is hereby granted to any person, magazine, newspaper, other periodical, or media to reprint this monograph in any single issue of the periodical in question, so long as two conditions are met: (1) the monograph is printed w= ord for word, including diagrams, figures, and footnotes, and (2) the following reference is given at the bottom of the first page on which the reprinted article begins:

“This article = is taken from OUR LETTER No. 11, titled To Musha, Somewhere in Afghanistan, February 22, 1986. Published = by Addresso’Set Publications, P.O. Box 3009, Vallejo, California 94590.”